Questions for the Neo-Calvinists of the 21st Century
Salvation is by grace through faith apart from works, as stated in Ephesians 2:8-10. No true believer would disagree. No genuine recipient of saving grace would dare promote"works"as a means for justification before God.
Sean Michael Morris·Jul 18, 2019·Updated Sep 3, 2026
Salvation is by grace through faith apart from works, as stated in No true believer would disagree. No genuine recipient of saving grace would dare promote "works" as a means for justification before God. However, that being said, we must be careful to uphold all of the teachings of Scripture pertaining to the subject. For, nowadays, many staunch defenders of "grace" disregard the "workmanship" of God in salvation
Such offenders would never readily admit it. Passion is a blinding force when it is not mixed with humility, even if one is passionate about the most noble of creeds. These men believe so "strongly" in salvation by grace through faith apart from works, they have begun to despise the mighty working of God in salvation. Being thus minded, a man once asked: "Do your blood-bought and Spirit-empowered works bring you approval before God?" This question was posed with animosity against many Scriptures that emphasize the work of God in salvation. Therefore, in humble defense, I have some questions for the questioner.
Hypocritical men are known to shield themselves from conviction by unlearnedquestions. This is a biblical fact It's only natural. Ungodly men feel threatened by the truth; therefore they seek to suppress it through questions and various forms of carnal reasoning However, hereby, the very means of discerning if someone is truly saved is fading from relevance among the remnant circles of Christianity
The nominal Calvinist of today has a superstitious and over-simplistic understanding of justification, the same superstition which is pervading much of the remnant. It is a seeming intelligent way of reasoning, and yet... it nullifies scriptural commands. According to a superstitious reasoning about salvation - “in Christ alone apart from works” - biblical commands, warnings, promises, behaviors, prayers, and heart-conditions are nullified. These over-simplistic statements need to be challenged by scripture and held in conformity thereto, no matter how “illogical” it feels to our deceitful hearts
Therefore, I plead, when a seemingly pious man adamantly states, “M yblood-bought and Spirit-empowered works cannot ever gain me approval before God.”, do not cave to tactics of intimidation. Do not remain silent. Question the man on the practicals of his statement of faith. Or, when you are questioned,"Do your blood-bought and Spirit-empowered works bring you approval before God?", here's some questions for the questioner:
Questions
"And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:"
— Rev. 2:26
Do you mean to say that you can go to heaven without, as Jesus said,"keeping My works unto the end" Do you believe the Church of Thyatira would have gone to heaven if they didn’t keep the “works” of Christ unto the end” What about the “works” of the other Churches
"Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God."
— Rev. 3:2
"Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love."
— Rev. 2:4
"But I have a few things against thee..."
— Rev. 2:14
"Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee..."
— Rev. 2:20
Do you believe the Church of Sardis would have gone to heaven if Christ did not find their “works perfect before God” Would Sardis go to heaven if they failed to, “be watchful” “remember” and “walk” For Sardis, are these “works” gaining or losing approval before God, upon which hinged their eternal standing? What about the “somewhat” that Christ had “against” the Church of Ephesus or, the “few things against” Pergamos and the “few things against” Thyatira Do you deny that Christ does “giveunto every one of [us] according to [our] works”
"Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling."
— Php. 2:12
"Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him. For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad."
— 2 Cor. 5:9-10
"Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain. And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible. I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."
— 1 Cor. 9:24-27
Do you mean to say that I can go to heaven even if I don’t, like Paul, “work out [my] own salvation with fear and trembling” (Php. 2:12)? If I didn’t do this “work” (by the grace of God in Christ) would I still be approved before God? Are you saying that “faith which worketh by love” avails to nothing Do you mean to say that I should never “labour” that I “may be accepted of [Christ]” on Judgment Day Are you saying that I need not"run" so as to win the prize, because Christ already ran Are you saying that if I do not"run", I will still win the incorruptible crown of eternal life Are you saying that I should not set my heart on running that I might obtain the crown, because running takes into consideration whether or not I will be approved before God on Judgment Day – a thing which, you say, I need not do?
"...be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life."
— Rev. 2:10
"For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;"
— Heb. 3:14
"To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:"
— Rom. 2:7
"Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses."
— 1 Tim. 6:12
Are you saying that I need not ever fear losing my everlasting life (my approval before God) if, when I am tried, I am near fainting instead of enduring unto the end Are you saying that a man should never have “patient continuance in well doing” so as to “seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life” Are you saying that I need not “fight” to “lay hold on eternal life” Are you saying that Christ will finally Judge my approval before the LORD without reference to or mindfulness of blood-bought and Spirit-empowered works, as indicators of saving faith?
"And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
— Matt. 25:40
"Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me."
— Mark 10:21
"Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life."
— 1 Tim. 6:17-19
Are you saying that"the sheep " would have gone to heaven (been approved before God), even if they never, as Christ said, “gave”, “took”, “clothed”, and “visited” Are you saying their approval has no reference to what they have “done” and that a Christian is in sin if they are mindful for what they must do, in this way, so as to be approved on Judgment Day? Are you saying that a man does not need to continue to believe in the Gospel, that he might be approved before God on Judgment Day? Are you saying that the Rich Man of could go to heaven, even if he did not sell all that he had and give it to the poor Are you saying that the rich Christians of will go to heaven even if they do not “do good”? Are you saying that these rich Christians will go to heaven even if they are not “rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate”? Are you saying that it is a sin to “do” anything that we might “lay hold on eternal life” Then why are these Christians commanded to do all these things, “that they may lay hold on eternal life”
"Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it."
— Matt. 7:24-27
"Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall."
— 1 Cor. 10:12
"And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares. For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth. Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man."
— Lk. 21:34-36
"But wilt thou know, Ovain man, that faith without works is dead?"
— James 2:20
"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only."
— James 2:24
Would Paul have gone to heaven if he did not bring his body under subjection Was it a sin for him to say that he would have been a castaway (one who is disapproved at final Judgment), if he failed to bring his body under subjection? Are you saying that I should never “hear” the sayings of Jesus Christ and do them, being minded that “whosoever heareth these sayings” and “doeththem”, will pass the trial of final Judgment (being “founded upon the rock”)? Are you saying it is a sin to fear a great fall on Final Judgment if I am one who “heareth” the “sayings” of Jesus and “doeth them not” Are you saying that I need not ever “take heed” to myself, after I am regenerated, “lest at any time [my] heart be overcharged with surfeiting [over-eating], and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that Day come upon [me] unawares”, to the end that I am “accounted” unworthy “to stand before the Son of Man” Are you saying that I should never fear perishing if I fail to do the Spirit-empowered work called, “Watch therefore and pray always” Would you say that, in all these ways, God judges a man’s faith and approval before God, “without works” Would you say that Abraham or Rahab were finally justified (or declared righteous at final Judgment) in some other way than “by works”
My reader, I ask you all these questions to beg the answer: Our understanding of the eternal sufficiency of Christ’s Person and Work must coincide and not contradict all these passages of scripture. Any doctrine of “justification” or “meritorious salvation” which does NOT include the former descriptions - of feeling, thinking, praying, living, and doing – is a tradition and superstition of man which makes void the commandments of God. These things which I have formerly mentioned are products of saving faith, and more so, a product of Christ in us, therefore it can be said in truth – these things are not separate from the Person and Work of Christ, but they are evidences of the Person and Work of Christ, literally speaking, as He is living and working through the people in whom He dwells.
Indeed, it is by Christ's life and righteousness alone we can be justified or find approval before God, but God doesn't examine our experience of"Christ's life and righteousness"in a singular sense - only in a PAST TENSE relationship that we have by testimony. Salvation is past, present, and future. Therefore, in reckoning with the saints, the LORD looks at our relationship with Christ's life and righteousnessTODAY - if we are abiding in Christ by an ongoing faith and repentance as we look to our Messiah who is alive in glory, being much more saved by His life The Scriptures explicitly teach the ongoingwork of salvation in true believers. Namely, that salvation is experienced in the past through conversion (regeneration) and at present in the same terms - through being crucified, resurrected, baptized, and quickened through the putting on of Christ. Accordingly, if our experience of salvation at present is found faulty by God, the LORD will reckon with us in terms of perfection, blamelessness, holiness, sanctification, spotlessness, and blemishes.
I am not debating if there is anything else other than Christ who justifies sinful men, but I am contending against an over-simplistic understanding of that justification - in how it is discerned by God and experienced by us in the past (as we relate to what Christ accomplished on the Cross), presently and progressively (as we relate to God today based upon what Christ did on the Cross), and finally (because Christ will be vindicated at final Judgment through what He did at Calvary, and also in our individual lives presently and progressively, for we are His workmanship), according to the Scriptures.
Intolerant Neo-Calvinists
The Neo-Calvinists of today cannot tolerate the Calvinism of George Whitefield. The following quotes are my case and point.
"Tremble for fear God should remove His candlestick from you. Labourers are sick. Those who did once labour are almost worn out... There are few who like to go out into the fields. Broken heads and dead cats are no longer the ornaments of a Methodist. These honourable badges are now no more. Langour has gotten from the ministers to the people; and, if you don't take care, we shall all be dead together. The Lord Jesus rouse you! Ye Methodists of many years' standing, shew the young ones, who have not the cross to bear as we once had what ancient Methodism was.
Don'tbe angry with a poor minister for weeping over them who will not weep for themselves. If you laugh at me I know Jesus smiles. I am free from the blood of you all. If you are damned for want of conversion, remember you are not damned for want of warning. YOU ARE GOSPEL-PROOF; and, if there is one place in hell deeper than another, God will order a gospel-despising Methodist to be put there. God convert you from lying a-bed in the morning! God convert you from conformity to the world! God convert you from lukewarmness! Do not get into a cursed antinomian way of thinking, and say, "I thank God, I have the root of the matter in me! I thank God, I was converted twenty or thirty years ago; and, though I can go to the public-house, and play at cards, yet, I am converted; for once in Christ, always in Christ." Whether you were converted formerly or not, you are perverted now. Would you have Jesus catch you napping, with your lamps untrimmed? Suffer the word of exhortation. I preach feelingly. I could be glad to preach till I preached myself dead, if God would convert you. I seldom sleep after three in the morning; and I pray every morning, "Lord, convert me, and make me a new creature today!"
— George Whitefield
The Neo-Calvinists today cannot tolerate anything that even remotely appears to question or contradict the TULIP, even if it is Scripture. Their conscience will not allow them to be tolerant because they are more loyal to the TULIP than to Scripture. However, Calvinists in ancient times were consciously bound to preach the truth of Scripture, exactly as it is stated in Scripture, even if some would misunderstand it. Our conformity to Christ should be measured by how much our thinking, conversing, praying, and preaching is conformed to Scripture.
Are you a student of Theology? Do you admire the attributes of God in Christ? Suffice it to say, if indeed God can change his mind, then this ability within the Godhead should be incorporated
At first glance, Jeremiah 31:31-34 seems to settle the argument. It appears to plainly declare the fundamental difference between the Old Covenant & the New Covenant, namely that not everyone in Israel knew the LORD.
I'm neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian. I am a Christian who Believes exactly what the Bible says. I believe that God is changeless, eternal, and irresistible, and I believe that God can change His mind
In short they say: If you get it, you can't lose it; and if you lose it you never had it. May God save us from accepting a doctrine, that must be defended by such fallacious reasoning!
The old truth that Calvin preached, that Augustine preached, that Paul preached, is the truth that I must preach to-day, or else be false to my conscience and my God.
Calvinists are divided against Arminians as George Whitefield was against John Wesley, and yet, what is so perplexing to the Body of Christ is that they were both regenerated, sin-hating, sincere, and soundly saved by grace through faith,
